Eating Tomatoes Lowers Prostate Cancer Risk

tomato.jpgMost people know that vegetables and fruits are good for us and should be part of our daily diet. But most people don’t know that tomatoes, in particular, can significantly help in the prevention of prostate cancer.

Tomatoes are rich in an antioxidant called lycopene. Lycopene is found in ample amounts in tomatoes, and only trace amounts can be found in certain other fruits and vegetables. Lycopene, like vitamins A,C,E and others, is a powerful antioxidant capable neutralising free radicals that cause cell damage, aging and disease.

It is not known exactly why lycopene helps to prevent prostate cancer, but it’s believed that it works with the immune system to somehow slow down or stop the process that leads to cancer developing in the prostate organ.

Dr Edward Giovannucci of Harvard Medical School and a team of Researchers conducted a study of the dietary intake of 48,000 males. Over a six-year period, they found that the men who ate tomatoes (at least 10 servings per week), had up to a 40% reduced risk of prostate cancer, compared to those who didn’t eat tomatoes.

That means regular male tomato-eaters have a significantly decreased risk of developing prostate cancer! However, lycopene, found mainly in tomatoes, is only absorbed with fats and oils, so there must be some form of fat in the recipe or meal to ensure maximum absorption of lycopene by the body.

Also, Dr Giovannucci said that cooked tomatoes seemed more effective than tomato juice or even eating raw tomatoes. So cooking tomatoes with a quality cooking oil, such as olive oil, may be the best way to reap the cancer-fighting benefits from tomatoes.

Interestingly, it was also found from the study that tomato-based products, as well as tomatoes, proved to be effective as well.

Read more about the study here.

1 Votes | Average: 8 out of 101 Votes | Average: 8 out of 101 Votes | Average: 8 out of 101 Votes | Average: 8 out of 101 Votes | Average: 8 out of 101 Votes | Average: 8 out of 101 Votes | Average: 8 out of 101 Votes | Average: 8 out of 101 Votes | Average: 8 out of 101 Votes | Average: 8 out of 10 (1 votes, average: 8 out of 10)
Loading ... Loading ...
Number of views: 554

Twins and Food Additives

Parents have long suspected that additives in processed foods can affect their children’s behaviour and mood,and possibly contribute to ADHD - attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Such serious concerns have pressurised some manufacturers to create processed foods without any additives.

An interesting experiment on the Trevor McDonald Tonight show (ITV, UK) demonstrated that identical twins fed altered diets behaved differently. Michael and Christopher Parker, aged 5, were put on different diets for two weeks.
sweets.gif
Christopher was allowed to eat his normal diet which included fizzy drinks, chocolates, ice cream, flavoured crisps and canned foods. Michael was banned from eating chocolate, artificially coloured sweets, soft drinks, certain canned foods and was allowed to eat fruit and other whole foods and to drink natural juice and water.

After two weeks, Michael became calmer, more assertive and talkative, while his brother remained the same. Aptitude tests before the experiment, devised by Professor Jim Stevenson of Southampton University, showed that the twins had similar concentration and IQ scores. Tests after the experiment demonstrated that Michael’s overall score had increased by 15% in comparison to his brother’s score who was fed his normal diet. Michael’s mum was amazed by his dramatic improvement.

The experiment was broadened to include Michael and Christopher’s classmates in Cheshire. After a fortnight of restricting additives, 57% of parents noticed improvements in their children’s behaviour and sleep patterns, suggesting that food additives may not only contribute but, in some cases, cause ADHD (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder).

This experiment suggests a low or free additive diet improves concentration, mood and even behaviour in some if not many children. However, firm conclusions should not be drawn from such an experiment - the children’s parents could have easily affected the experiment’s outcome and/or the improvement could be down to increased vitamin and mineral intake, or some other factor, but this experiment’s findings are supported by a number of studies!

This experiment was conducted by: www.ITV.com

3 Votes | Average: 8.67 out of 103 Votes | Average: 8.67 out of 103 Votes | Average: 8.67 out of 103 Votes | Average: 8.67 out of 103 Votes | Average: 8.67 out of 103 Votes | Average: 8.67 out of 103 Votes | Average: 8.67 out of 103 Votes | Average: 8.67 out of 103 Votes | Average: 8.67 out of 103 Votes | Average: 8.67 out of 10 (3 votes, average: 8.67 out of 10)
Loading ... Loading ...
Number of views: 586